Strategic Management and Leadership for Psychology-myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theStrategic Management and Leadership Skillsfor Psychology. Answer: Inside the theory of psychological types founded by Carl Jung, the personalities of people can possibly be categorized in different types according to the preference of their common attitude extraverted vs. introverted - or their penchant towards one of the two following functions of perceptions sensing vs. intuition - and their inclination towards one of the two functions of judging - thinking vs. feeling (Knig, Merz and Trauffer 2012). The three forms of preferences that were familiarized by Jung himself are called dichotomies, which are bipolar dimensions in which each pole is representative of the different preferences (Tay, Jung and Park 2014). Jung even had a postposition that in one person only one of the four functions are dominant a function of judging or a function of perception. Isabel Briggs Myers, a famous practitioner and researcher of Jungs theory, put forward a proposition for seeing the judging-perceiving association as the fourth dichotomy that influences the per sonality type - judging vs. perceiving (Atay 2012). Taking Jungs personality typology test, I found that I fall into the most common form of personality type ESFJ personality, which is the short form for Extravert, Sensing, Feeling,and Judging. I have more preference for extraversion instead of introversion, more for sensing instead of intuition, more for feeling instead of thinking, and marginal or none for judging over perceiving. People who fall in this category of personality types are popular, making sense that it is the most common type, with 12% of the population falling in this (Friedman and Schustack 2016). ESFJs are known to be taking the spotlight and leading their teams towards victory and fame. They continue their life by supporting their families and friends, organizing events and gathering and giving in the best for making sure everyone is happy (Humanmetrics.com 2017). I personally relate with these characteristics as I consider myself as a social creature, thriving on staying updated with what my near and dear ones a re doing. I am not too much involved or interested in talking about politics. Instead I am more concerned about fashion, appearances, social status and the standings of other people. Being interested in more practical matters, I attempt doing my best in using my power for good. I am altruist, as per the test results, and I agree to that as I am serious about taking responsibilities for helping and doing the right thing. I have sensed my moral compass being based on traditions and laws, all the while safeguarding rules and authority instead of simply drawing my morality from mysticism or philosophy. What I have to understand is that people might come from different backgrounds and have different viewpoints and what might seem right to me might not be the absolute truth always. I love being of use and service, always trying to enjoy whichever role I would be helpful for me to participate in a constructive way, as long as I feel I am given my proper value and appreciation. I have found evidence of this especially at home, and I agree with the test results on the evidence that I am loyal and would make a devoted partner and parent. According to the test results, I am considered to be respectful of hierarchy and I do my best in positioning myselves with some authority, both at work and home, allowing myself to remain clear, stable and organized. Inside the test results it is displayed that I can always be spotted at parties and chatting and laughing with everyone. Even though the second part of this statement is correct, I do not think that I am a party animal. However, it is a fact that I do like to hear about my friends activities and their lives, always remembering the details and ready to talk about their problems and helping them out with those. I easily pick up on any tension existing in the room and attempt at restoring the peace and stability in the group. I do, however, spend a lot of my energy on establishing social order and I look forward to planned and organized events over open-ended activities or unplanned get-together. As per the result, ESFJ people put in a lot of exertion into their arranged activities and they feel hurt if their suggestions get rejected or people no more show interest (Yilmaz and OConnor 2012). This traits are very true for me and I understand that I must remember that people come from dif ferent places and they might be disinterested in a particular thing or any organized plan. I have found out that my sensitivity is my biggest challenge, and I need to take everything into stride, even when people disagree or criticize and that hurts. I have to take all of this positively as it is all a part of life. The best thing that I can do is what I do best be a role model for people who believe in me, take care of things that are in my control and bask in the satisfaction that so many people are appreciative of the efforts I make. Based on some researches and analyses, the reliability of the test can be judged. On retesting, people get three to four types of preferences the same 75-90% of the time. The reliability score of the test is good, across ages and ethnic groups, even the score is lower in some other cases with some other groups. Some groups have low reliabilities, and in these situations, caution is necessary. With a week gap, people gets a new type the next time. Reliability can improve if psychologists use a numeric score. Research says, numeric scores are better, providing a spectrum in terms of personality traits (Cohen, Ornoy and Keren 2013). A better and enhanced way of looking at personality is through the "Big Five" personality traits, which includes conscientiousness,openness, agreeableness, neuroticism and extraversion. Even though it do not assign any specific personality type, it is effective in telling is about the individual traits of a persons personality (Cobb-Clark and Schurer 2012). References Atay, S., 2012. The standardization of Myers-Briggs type indicator into Turkisk: an application on students.Journal of Instructional Psychology,39(2), p.74. Cobb-Clark, D.A. and Schurer, S., 2012. The stability of big-five personality traits.Economics Letters,115(1), pp.11-15. Cohen, Y., Ornoy, H. and Keren, B., 2013. MBTI personality types of project managers and their success: A field survey.Project Management Journal,44(3), pp.78-87. Friedman, H.S. and Schustack, M.W., 2016.Personality: Classic theories and modern research. Pearson. Humanmetrics.com. 2017.Leverage Your Personality Type. [online] Available at: https://www.humanmetrics.com/personality/esfj-type?EI=6SN=12TF=-9JP=3#top [Accessed 14 Sep. 2017]. Knig, C.J., Merz, A.S. and Trauffer, N., 2012. What is in applicants' minds when they fill out a personality test? Insights from a qualitative study.International Journal of Selection and Assessment,20(4), pp.442-452. Tay, B., Jung, Y. and Park, T., 2014. When stereotypes meet robots: the double-edge sword of robot gender and personality in humanrobot interaction.Computers in Human Behavior,38, pp.75-84. Yilmaz, M. and OConnor, R.V., 2012, September. Towards the understanding and classification of the personality traits of software development practitioners: Situational context cards approach. InSoftware Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA), 2012 38th EUROMICRO Conference on(pp. 400-405). IEEE.